Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1631860
| From | Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd |
| Date | 2017-04-27 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAJQJ-4gp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tAC2R-7gR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tACFz-7Oy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen. > I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing anything > obvious ... looking at the trace above it appears that the problem is > when get_net() goes to bump the refcount and the passed net pointer is > NULL; unless I'm missing something, the only way this would happen in > kauditd_thread() is if the auditd_conn.pid value is non-zero but the > auditd_conn.net pointer is NULL. > > That shouldn't happen. > > The only way I could see that even being possible is if the > sock_net(NETLINK_CB(skb).sk) call in audit_receive_msg() returned NULL > which in turned was passed as the net pointer (third parameter) in the > auditd_set() call. Once again, I don't think this should ever be > possible? Am I missing something? I don't have time to look into it yet, I think I can take a look tomorrow. > > I realize you aren't able to reproduce this reliably, but if you do, > any chance you try it with Linus' tree? I'd like to see if we can > rule out the changes in net-next (my testing doesn't typically include > net-next patches). > Will do, I tried to boot for ~6 times today to reproduce it but just saw it once. Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 22:50 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-26 23:30 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 07:10 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 22:40 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 23:40 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 23:50 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-28 00:40 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 01:50 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-28 02:50 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-28 17:40 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 18:20 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-28 18:30 +0200
Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 08:00 +0200
csiph-web