Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1631860

Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd

From Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd
Date 2017-04-27 07:10 +0200
Message-ID <tAJQJ-4gp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tAC2R-7gR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tACFz-7Oy-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report, this is the only one like it that I've seen.
> I'm looking at the code in Linus' tree and I'm not seeing anything
> obvious ... looking at the trace above it appears that the problem is
> when get_net() goes to bump the refcount and the passed net pointer is
> NULL; unless I'm missing something, the only way this would happen in
> kauditd_thread() is if the auditd_conn.pid value is non-zero but the
> auditd_conn.net pointer is NULL.
>
> That shouldn't happen.
>
> The only way I could see that even being possible is if the
> sock_net(NETLINK_CB(skb).sk) call in audit_receive_msg() returned NULL
> which in turned was passed as the net pointer (third parameter) in the
> auditd_set() call.  Once again, I don't think this should ever be
> possible?  Am I missing something?

I don't have time to look into it yet, I think I can take a look tomorrow.

>
> I realize you aren't able to reproduce this reliably, but if you do,
> any chance you try it with Linus' tree?  I'd like to see if we can
> rule out the changes in net-next (my testing doesn't typically include
> net-next patches).
>

Will do, I tried to boot for ~6 times today to reproduce it but just saw
it once.

Thanks.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 22:50 +0200
  Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-26 23:30 +0200
    Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 07:10 +0200
    Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 22:40 +0200
      Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 23:40 +0200
        Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 23:50 +0200
          Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-28 00:40 +0200
            Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 01:50 +0200
              Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-28 02:50 +0200
                Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-28 17:40 +0200
                Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 18:20 +0200
                Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2017-04-28 18:30 +0200
                Re: Boot regression caused by kauditd Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 08:00 +0200

csiph-web