Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1631767
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix how load gets propagated from cfs_rq to its sched_entity |
| Date | 2017-04-27 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tADBD-b2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tzSCK-37e-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzSCK-37e-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAxPA-4Ed-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, Vincent.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 06:14:17PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > + if (gcfs_rq->load.weight) {
> > + long shares = calc_cfs_shares(gcfs_rq, gcfs_rq->tg);
> >
> > + load = min(gcfs_rq->runnable_load_avg *
> > + shares / gcfs_rq->load.weight, shares);
>
> There is a unit problem above:
> runnable_load_avg and shares are not in the same range but
> runnable_load_avg and scale_load_down(gcfs_rq->load.weight) are so
> you should use
> gcfs_rq->runnable_load_avg * scale_load_down(shares) /
> scale_load_down(gcfs_rq->load.weight).
But the only difference there is that we lose accuracy in calculation;
otherwise, the end results are the same, no?
> Hopefully both scale_load_down cancel between them
> But the min should be then tested with scale_load_down(shares) and not
> only shares
Ah, that's right. The min should be against scaled down shares.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix how load gets propagated from cfs_rq to its sched_entity Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-04-26 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix how load gets propagated from cfs_rq to its sched_entity Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-04-27 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix how load gets propagated from cfs_rq to its sched_entity Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-04-27 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix how load gets propagated from cfs_rq to its sched_entity Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-04-28 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix how load gets propagated from cfs_rq to its sched_entity Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-05-02 09:30 +0200
csiph-web