Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1630433

Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack

From Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack
Date 2017-04-25 14:00 +0200
Message-ID <tA7ip-4eL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tzB8R-8mO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tA630-3ve-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:35:33PM +0300, Maksim Salau wrote:
> > +			} else if (object_is_on_stack(urb->transfer_buffer)) {
> > +				WARN_ONCE(1, "transfer buffer is on stack\n");
> > +				ret = -EAGAIN;
> >  			} else {
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Has anyone considered a fail-safe mode? I.e.: if a buffer is on stack,
> kmemdup it and continue with a warning. This will give us both: functional
> drivers (with possibly decreased efficiency in speed and memory footprint)
> and warnings for developers that a particular driver requires attention.

No, I do not want that, let's fix the drivers.

> This mode will not affect drivers which obey the rules, but will make
> offenders at least functional. My main concern is that not every user is able
> to detect and report a problem, which prevents drivers from functioning.
> Especially this is a problem for not wide spread devices.
> Due to this users a seeing unusable equipment, but developers are not
> aware of those, even if fixes are trivial.
> 
> Such mode has a also a negative effect: if a developer has a device
> with an offending driver, he can miss the warning message, since the driver
> just works.

Exactly, let's fix the bugs.  These have been bugs for 10+ years now,
they should get fixed, it's not complex :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 03:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on  stack Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de> - 2017-04-24 09:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on  stack Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-04-24 15:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on  stack Maksim Salau <maksim.salau@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 12:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on  stack Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-04-25 14:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> - 2017-04-25 15:30 +0200

csiph-web