Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1630433
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack |
| Date | 2017-04-25 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tA7ip-4eL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tzB8R-8mO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tA630-3ve-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:35:33PM +0300, Maksim Salau wrote:
> > + } else if (object_is_on_stack(urb->transfer_buffer)) {
> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "transfer buffer is on stack\n");
> > + ret = -EAGAIN;
> > } else {
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone considered a fail-safe mode? I.e.: if a buffer is on stack,
> kmemdup it and continue with a warning. This will give us both: functional
> drivers (with possibly decreased efficiency in speed and memory footprint)
> and warnings for developers that a particular driver requires attention.
No, I do not want that, let's fix the drivers.
> This mode will not affect drivers which obey the rules, but will make
> offenders at least functional. My main concern is that not every user is able
> to detect and report a problem, which prevents drivers from functioning.
> Especially this is a problem for not wide spread devices.
> Due to this users a seeing unusable equipment, but developers are not
> aware of those, even if fixes are trivial.
>
> Such mode has a also a negative effect: if a developer has a device
> with an offending driver, he can miss the warning message, since the driver
> just works.
Exactly, let's fix the bugs. These have been bugs for 10+ years now,
they should get fixed, it's not complex :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 03:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de> - 2017-04-24 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-04-24 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack Maksim Salau <maksim.salau@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-04-25 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: Warn if an URB's transfer_buffer is on stack Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> - 2017-04-25 15:30 +0200
csiph-web