Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1578624

Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are offline

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Fri 10-02-17 23:31:41, Hoeun Ryu wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > > On Fri 10-02-17 17:32:07, Hoeun Ryu wrote:
>> [...]
>> > >>  static unsigned long *alloc_thread_stack_node(struct task_struct *tsk, int node)
>> > >> @@ -456,6 +474,11 @@ void __init fork_init(void)
>> > >>       for (i = 0; i < UCOUNT_COUNTS; i++) {
>> > >>               init_user_ns.ucount_max[i] = max_threads/2;
>> > >>       }
>> > >> +
>> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
>> > >> +     cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "vm_stack_cache",
>> > >> +                       NULL, free_vm_stack_cache);
>> > >> +#endif
>> > >
>> > > I am not familiar the new hotplug infrastructure so I might be missing
>> > > something. CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN will allocate a state which is has only
>> > > 30 slots available. The name also suggests this will be called on an
>> > > online event. Why doesn't this have its own state like other users. The
>> > > name should also reflect offline event CPUHP_STACK_CACHE_DEAD or
>> > > something like that.
>> >
>> > I'll define CPUHP_VMSTACK_CACHE_DEAD before CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN in
>> > cpuhotplug.h.
>> > Do you think the change is made in a separate patch or not ?
>>
>> I think it should be in a single patch. I am not sure what are the rules
>> to define a new state though. Let's CC Thomas.
>
> So the first question is where do you want that to be called? i.e. in which
> section:
>
> CPU up          CPU down
>
> PREPARE         DEAD            <- called on some other CPU
> ONLINE          DOWN            <- called on the hotplugged CPU
>

It doesn't matter whether the callback is called on the hotplugged CPU
or other CPUs.

> And then the next question is whether you have ordering constraints,
> i.e. it must be called before or after some other callback. Only in that
> case you want to have an explicit state. If not, just use a dynamically
> allocated one.

The cache is for virtually mapped kernel stacks. so I think the
callback should be called after all tasks are migrated to other CPUs.
It must reside before CPUHP_AP_SCHED_STARTING or CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU.

>
> Thanks,
>
>         tglx

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are offline Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 09:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are  offline Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-10 13:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are offline Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 15:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are  offline Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-10 15:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are offline Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 16:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are  offline Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-02-10 16:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are  offline Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-02-10 16:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are offline Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 18:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are  offline Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-02-10 19:00 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are offline Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 00:40 +0100

csiph-web