Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1578622
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly |
| Date | 2017-02-10 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9mIa-5ZB-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t93YS-2u7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t93YS-2u7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9gCK-2aq-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Thu 09-02-17 12:53:02, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> The SHM_HUGE_* stuff was introduced in:
>>
>> 42d7395feb5 (mm: support more pagesizes for MAP_HUGETLB/SHM_HUGETLB)
>>
>> It unnecessarily adds another layer, specific to sysv shm, without
>> anything special about it: the macros are identical to the MAP_HUGE_*
>> stuff, which in turn does correctly describe the hugepage subsystem.
>>
>> One example of the problems with extra layers what this patch fixes:
>> mmap_pgoff() should never be using SHM_HUGE_* logic. It is obviously
>> harmless but it would still be grand to get rid of it -- although
>> now in the manpages I don't see that happening.
>
>Can we just drop SHM_HUGE_MASK altogether? It is not exported in uapi
>headers AFAICS.
Yeah that was my original idea, however I noticed that shmget.2 mentions
kernel internals as part of SHM_HUGE_{2MB,1GB}, ie: SHM_HUGE_SHIFT. So
dropping _MASK doesn't make sense if we are going to keep _SHIFT.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4/4] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-02-09 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-10 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-02-10 18:00 +0100
csiph-web