Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1578326
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory |
| Date | 2017-02-10 10:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9fGF-1x8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <t982u-5bz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9dvc-fW-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9fdE-17p-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9fdE-17p-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9fGF-1x8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri 10-02-17 17:15:59, Yisheng Xie wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Thanks for comment! > On 2017/2/10 16:52, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 10-02-17 16:48:58, Yisheng Xie wrote: > >> Hi Michal, > >> > >> Thanks for comment! > >> On 2017/2/10 15:09, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>> On Fri 10-02-17 09:13:58, Yisheng Xie wrote: > >>>> hi Michal, > >>>> Thanks for your comment. > >>>> > >>>> On 2017/2/9 21:41, Michal Hocko wrote: > > [...] > >>>>>> OK, so this is a memcg OOM killer which panics because the configuration > >>>>>> says so. The OOM report doesn't say so and that is the bug. dump_header > >>>>>> is memcg aware and mem_cgroup_out_of_memory initializes oom_control > >>>>>> properly. Is this Vanilla kernel? > >>>> > >>>> That means we should raise the limit of that memcg to avoid memcg OOM killer, right? > >>> > >>> Why do you configure the system to panic on memcg OOM in the first > >>> place. This is a wrong thing to do in 99% of cases. > >> > >> For our production think it should use reboot to recovery the system when OOM, > >> instead of killing user's key process. Maybe not the right thing. > > > > I can understand that for the global oom killer but not for memcg. You > > can recover the oom even without killing any process. You can simply > > increase the limit from the userspace when the oom event is triggered. > > So you mean set oom_kill_disable and increase the limit from userspace > when memcg under_oom, right? yes -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> - 2017-02-09 14:00 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 14:50 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> - 2017-02-10 02:20 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-10 08:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-10 10:00 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-10 10:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> - 2017-02-10 10:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> - 2017-02-10 10:00 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC] 3.10 kernel- oom with about 24G free memory Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-02-09 15:30 +0100
csiph-web