Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1578963
| From | Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 4.10 set 3 - a couple of regression fixes. |
| Date | 2017-02-11 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9C0x-7jp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t7rsB-5vE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7rsC-5vE-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7rsC-5vE-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9A8q-69n-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9A8q-69n-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/02/17 07:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:35:35PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:35:02AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>> The following changes since commit 5c113b5e0082e90d2e1c7b12e96a7b8cf0623e27: >>>> >>>> iio: dht11: Use usleep_range instead of msleep for start signal (2017-01-22 13:35:40 +0000) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-4.10c >>> >>> It's a bit late for 4.10 for me, can I just pull this into my -next >>> branch and will they get to 4.10.1 properly? Meaning, do that have cc: >>> stable markings on them? Or do you want to fix that up and resend this >>> request? >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> You should ask Ken Lin who has the HW and who is apparently affected. >> I think it's bad that you are willing to have a known regression hit >> v4.10 when all was fine in v4.9. Or perhaps you didn't realize that >> the regression was from this cycle? >> >> The fixes are obvious. I don't understand your hesitation. > > My "hesitation" is that I'm about to get on a plane for a day or so and > don't have the time to get this to Linus before 4.10-final is out this > Sunday. Getting it in a week later should be ok, we all make mistakes, > as long as we fix them it's all good, and for 4.10.1 should be ok. Who knows, maybe Linus will delay another week anyway ;) Wasn't looking that clear when I sent these out. From my point of view, sure 4.10.1 should be fine. I'll put stable CCs on them. Will send the pull out shortly so I don't forget about them. Pull request clearly now becomes first set of fixes for 4.11. Jonathan > > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: pressure: mpl3115: do not rely on structure field ordering Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2017-02-05 10:40 +0100
Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 4.10 set 3 - a couple of regression fixes. Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-02-11 08:20 +0100
Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 4.10 set 3 - a couple of regression fixes. Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2017-02-11 10:20 +0100
csiph-web