Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1577905

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

From Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node
Date 2017-02-09 21:00 +0100
Message-ID <t932N-1TR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <t335w-PG-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3dHz-7CG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8YZc-7Tl-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8YZc-7Tl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8Zsd-8j1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Quoting Rob Herring (2017-02-09 08:00:05)
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:17:58AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> Frank, any more comments on this? If not, I plan to apply this series.
> >
> > Well, I find that a little annoying, because DT has the requirement
> > that new bindings are properly documented in Documentation, and it
> > appears that this comes with no documentation what so ever, despite
> > introducing new properties (like the -map-mask-passthru thing).
> >
> > So I'm NAKing it until there's some documentation of how this
> > mechanism is supposed to work.
> >
> > Merely providing an example in a commit log is (IMHO) insufficient.
> > An example doesn't explain how it was created, or how to create an
> > implementation.
> 
> Yes, you are right.
> 
> However, I'd like to see this documented in the DT spec, rather than
> kernel Documentation/ as this is a core binding. Though that would
> also imply first moving the GPIO bindings there. Perhaps just how this
> works generically could be in the spec, but the GPIO specifics can
> live with the rest of the GPIO bindings for now. This is intended to
> extend to other bindings.

I will make a patch against the devicetree spec and send it as a reply
to this series.

> 
> > Remember, we expect people to do exactly that, so we need to give
> > them this information so that they can make use of it.
> >
> > I did try to work out from the code how the -map-mask thing worked,
> > but eventually gave up.
> 
> The code is definitely hard to follow and I've not come up with any
> ways to make it easier to read. It's largely copied from the
> interrupt-map version, but different enough that sharing isn't really
> possible either.
> 
> For interrupts, it's documented in the DT spec. The best (only?)
> explanation for how interrupt-map works is here[1] (used to be at
> devicetree.org).
> 

interrupt-map is also documented in the latest DT spec[2]. I can add
another section for "Generic Nexus Properties" and describe how this
code works.

[2] http://www.devicetree.org/specifications-pdf

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists  through a nexus node Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-02-09 16:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through  a nexus node Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a  nexus node Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> - 2017-02-09 21:00 +0100

csiph-web