Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1577781
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH RT 1/2] workqueue: use rcu_readlock() in put_pwq_unlocked() |
| Date | 2017-02-09 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t90eC-98-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t90eC-98-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
3.12.70-rt94-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> The RCU sched protection was changed to RCU only and so all IRQ-off and preempt-off disabled region were changed to the relevant rcu-read-lock primitives. One was missed and triggered: |[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] |4.4.30-rt41 #51 Tainted: G W |btattach/345 is trying to release lock ( |Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6bbb |Backtrace: |[<c016b5a0>] (lock_release) from [<c0804844>] (rt_spin_unlock+0x20/0x30) |[<c0804824>] (rt_spin_unlock) from [<c0138954>] (put_pwq_unlocked+0xa4/0x118) |[<c01388b0>] (put_pwq_unlocked) from [<c0138b2c>] (destroy_workqueue+0x164/0x1b0) |[<c01389c8>] (destroy_workqueue) from [<c078e1ac>] (hci_unregister_dev+0x120/0x21c) |[<c078e08c>] (hci_unregister_dev) from [<c054f658>] (hci_uart_tty_close+0x90/0xbc) |[<c054f5c8>] (hci_uart_tty_close) from [<c03a2be8>] (tty_ldisc_close+0x50/0x58) |[<c03a2b98>] (tty_ldisc_close) from [<c03a2cb4>] (tty_ldisc_kill+0x18/0x78) |[<c03a2c9c>] (tty_ldisc_kill) from [<c03a3528>] (tty_ldisc_release+0x100/0x134) |[<c03a3428>] (tty_ldisc_release) from [<c039cd68>] (tty_release+0x3bc/0x460) |[<c039c9ac>] (tty_release) from [<c020cc08>] (__fput+0xe0/0x1b4) |[<c020cb28>] (__fput) from [<c020cd3c>] (____fput+0x10/0x14) |[<c020cd2c>] (____fput) from [<c013e0d4>] (task_work_run+0xa4/0xb8) |[<c013e030>] (task_work_run) from [<c0121754>] (do_exit+0x40c/0x8b0) |[<c0121348>] (do_exit) from [<c0122ff8>] (do_group_exit+0x54/0xc4) Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Tested-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> --- kernel/workqueue.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 5e7cd0dcf6a4..6d36faa3b666 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -1135,9 +1135,11 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq) * As both pwqs and pools are RCU protected, the * following lock operations are safe. */ + rcu_read_lock(); local_spin_lock_irq(pendingb_lock, &pwq->pool->lock); put_pwq(pwq); local_spin_unlock_irq(pendingb_lock, &pwq->pool->lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); } } -- 2.10.2
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RT 1/2] workqueue: use rcu_readlock() in put_pwq_unlocked() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-09 18:00 +0100
csiph-web