Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1576138
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: /proc/timer_list leaks the real pids of the associated processes |
| Date | 2017-02-07 23:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t8mKf-q3-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t6VM5-g9-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6VM5-g9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Xing Gao <xgao01@email.wm.edu> wrote: > > Dear Thomas and Kees, > > > > I posted a bug report on bugzilla, and John asked me to send it the lkml. > > > > Here is the link, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193921 > > > > Please cc to me when you reply this email. > > > > And please check the information below. > > > > The pseudo file /proc/timer_list leaks the real pids of the associated > > processes. > > > > The function print_timer(kernel/time/timer_list.c) displays > > timer->start_pid, which is set inside the function > > __timer_stats_timer_set_start_info (kernel/time/timer.c). This is the real > > pid, rather than the pid in the pid namespace. If the user within a > > container retrieves the content of /proc/timer_list, this file will leak the > > real pid of the associated process. > > I feel like this has been pointed out before, but I can't find the > email about it. Regardless, yeah, this looks true: > > SEQ_printf(m, ", %s/%d", tmp, timer->start_pid); > > #11: <0000000000000000>, hrtimer_wakeup, S:01, do_nanosleep, cron/2570 > > Seems like this should be made namespace aware... (and why is this > file needed at all? Seems like it should live in debugfs not proc). I'm fine with that. The TIMER_STATS stuff should go away completely. If people are interested in that information they can use the tracer which gives way better data than that file. Thanks, tglx .
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: /proc/timer_list leaks the real pids of the associated processes Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2017-02-04 00:50 +0100
Re: /proc/timer_list leaks the real pids of the associated processes Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-02-07 23:50 +0100
Re: /proc/timer_list leaks the real pids of the associated processes Jessica Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com> - 2017-02-08 00:00 +0100
Re: /proc/timer_list leaks the real pids of the associated processes Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-02-08 10:50 +0100
Re: /proc/timer_list leaks the real pids of the associated processes Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2017-02-08 00:30 +0100
Re: /proc/timer_list leaks the real pids of the associated processes Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2017-02-08 00:40 +0100
csiph-web