Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1576096

Re: [PATCH] mprotect: drop overprotective lock_pte_protection()

From Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mprotect: drop overprotective lock_pte_protection()
Date 2017-02-07 22:50 +0100
Message-ID <t8lOb-8hG-47@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t8f61-45q-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue,  7 Feb 2017 17:33:47 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> lock_pte_protection() uses pmd_lock() to make sure that we have stable
> PTE page table before walking pte range.
> 
> That's not necessary. We only need to make sure that PTE page table is
> established. It cannot vanish under us as long as we hold mmap_sem at
> least for read.
> 
> And we already have helper for that -- pmd_trans_unstable().

http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-mprotect-use-pmd_trans_unstable-instead-of-taking-the-pmd_lock.patch
already did this?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] mprotect: drop overprotective lock_pte_protection() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-07 15:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mprotect: drop overprotective lock_pte_protection() Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> - 2017-02-07 22:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mprotect: drop overprotective lock_pte_protection() Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-07 22:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mprotect: drop overprotective lock_pte_protection() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-02-08 13:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mprotect: drop overprotective lock_pte_protection() Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> - 2017-02-08 15:10 +0100

csiph-web