Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1575267
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] namei: Remove unlikely annotation for revalidate check in lookup_fast() |
| Date | 2017-02-07 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t81w5-3FY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t7ZNE-2v6-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 05:17:35PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > The likely/unlikely profiler showed that the unlikely around the > dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE was wrong 95% of the time. Adding > trace_printk()s, it revealed that the dentry ops had hooks to: > > kernfs_dop_revalidate > pid_revalidate > proc_sys_revalidate > tid_fd_revalidate > > As tools today now access files that have these operations often, it's best > just to remove the annotation, as it is more dependent on use cases and not > normal mode of operation if it will be true or not. "Tools" being what, exactly? What kind of load had that been measured on?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] namei: Remove unlikely annotation for revalidate check in lookup_fast() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-06 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] namei: Remove unlikely annotation for revalidate check in lookup_fast() Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-02-07 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] namei: Remove unlikely annotation for revalidate check in lookup_fast() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-07 02:40 +0100
csiph-web