Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1574992
| From | Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge |
| Date | 2017-02-06 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t7UNZ-7sP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t6ZmF-32o-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6ZmG-32o-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7P1U-3Pt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 21:36 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Many drivers have a common pattern of searching the OF graph for either an
> > attached panel or bridge and then finding the DRM struct for the panel
> > or bridge. Also, most drivers need to handle deferred probing when the
> > DRM device is not yet instantiated. Create a common function,
> > drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge, to find the connected node and the
> > associated DRM panel or bridge device.
[...]
> > +int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct device_node *np,
> > + int port, int endpoint,
> > + struct drm_panel **panel,
> > + struct drm_bridge **bridge)
> > +{
> > + int ret = -ENODEV;
>
> This is only returned if !panel && !bridge. I'd consider this invalid
> usage of this function, so maybe use -EINVAL?
Yes.
> > + struct device_node *remote;
> > +
> > + remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, port, endpoint);
> > + if (!remote)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + if (bridge)
> > + *bridge = NULL;
>
> I would move this ^ ...
>
> > + if (panel) {
> > + *panel = of_drm_find_panel(remote);
> > + if (*panel) {
>
> ... here.
Okay.
> > + ret = 0;
> > + goto out_put;
> > + }
> > + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (bridge) {
> > + *bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
> > + if (*bridge)
> > + ret = 0;
> > + else
> > + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + }
> > +out_put:
> > + of_node_put(remote);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
I've ended up re-writing things a bit getting rid of the goto and the
result looks like this:
int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct device_node *np,
int port, int endpoint,
struct drm_panel **panel,
struct drm_bridge **bridge)
{
int ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
struct device_node *remote;
if (!panel && !bridge)
return -EINVAL;
remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, port, endpoint);
if (!remote)
return -ENODEV;
if (panel) {
*panel = of_drm_find_panel(remote);
if (*panel) {
if (bridge)
*bridge = NULL;
ret = 0;
}
}
/* No panel found yet, check for a bridge next. */
if (ret && bridge) {
*bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
if (*bridge)
ret = 0;
}
of_node_put(remote);
return ret;
}
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/5] DRM OF graph clean-up Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-04 04:40 +0100
[PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-04 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> - 2017-02-06 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-06 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-02-06 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-06 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-02-06 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 21:00 +0100
[PATCH 1/5] of: introduce of_graph_get_remote_node Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-04 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: introduce of_graph_get_remote_node Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> - 2017-02-04 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: introduce of_graph_get_remote_node Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2017-02-06 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: introduce of_graph_get_remote_node Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-06 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: introduce of_graph_get_remote_node Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-02-06 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: introduce of_graph_get_remote_node Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-06 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: introduce of_graph_get_remote_node Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-02-06 15:10 +0100
[PATCH 5/5] drm: omap: use common OF graph helpers Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-04 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/5] DRM OF graph clean-up Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-02-04 11:50 +0100
csiph-web