Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1574497
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gicv3: Fix GICR_WAKE & GICD_IGROUPR accesses from non-secure |
| Date | 2017-02-06 10:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t7NWa-3aZ-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t7H4l-75U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM Ltd |
Hi Shanker,
On 06/02/17 02:17, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> On systems where it supports two security states, both the register
> GICR_WAKE and GICD_IGROUPR accesses are RAZ/WI from non-secure.
> The function gic_enable_redist() to wake/sleep redistributor is not
> harmful at all, but it is confusing looking at the code. The current
> code checks the single security state based on bit GICD_CTLR.DS which
> is absolutely incorrect. The disable security bit GICD_CTLR.DS is RAZ
> to non-secure.
I'm afraid we don't have the same definition of GICD_CTLR.DS. In my copy
of the architecture spec, it says:
"When this field is set to 1, all accesses to GICD_CTLR access the
single Security state view, and all bits are accessible".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This would tend to support my interpretation that once DS has been set
from the secure side, it becomes visible to all type of accesses.
> The GICD_TYPE.SecurityExtn indicates whether the GIC
> implementation supports two security states or only one security
> state.
Yes, and that's orthogonal to having set DS or not.
So clearly, we have a difference of interpretation. What part of the
spec is supporting yours?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] irqchip/gicv3: Fix GICR_WAKE & GICD_IGROUPR accesses from non-secure Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-06 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gicv3: Fix GICR_WAKE & GICD_IGROUPR accesses from non-secure Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-02-06 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gicv3: Fix GICR_WAKE & GICD_IGROUPR accesses from non-secure Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-06 14:00 +0100
csiph-web