Re: [lkp-robot] [mm, vmscan] 5e56dfbd83: fsmark.files_per_sec -11.1% regression

From	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [lkp-robot] [mm, vmscan] 5e56dfbd83: fsmark.files_per_sec -11.1% regression
Date	2017-02-06 09:20 +0100
Message-ID	<t7MGK-2kY-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<t2BCh-8lT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t39DY-4W7-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3nnz-5nP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3OnM-5wh-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <t73JD-68d-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat 04-02-17 16:16:04, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> On 01/26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Wed 25-01-17 12:27:06, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> >> On 01/24, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >> >perf profiles before and after the patch.
> >> 
> >> Here is the perf profiles, 
> >
> >I do not see any reclaim path in the profile... Could you take a
> >snapshot of /proc/vmstat and /proc/zoneinfo before and after the test
> >please?
> 
> Sorry for the late, just come back from a vacation. Proc data is attached.

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. Could you provide this data for both with
the patch applied and without, please?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [lkp-robot] [mm, vmscan]  5e56dfbd83:  fsmark.files_per_sec  -11.1% regression Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-06 09:20 +0100
  Re: [lkp-robot] [mm, vmscan]  5e56dfbd83:  fsmark.files_per_sec  -11.1% regression Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-07 15:50 +0100

csiph-web