Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1574320

RE: [PATCH] acpica: Fix double-free in acpi_ns_repair_CID()

From "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH] acpica: Fix double-free in acpi_ns_repair_CID()
Date 2017-02-06 02:50 +0100
Message-ID <t7GBj-6H0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t6T7A-6Ri-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6ZZp-3wQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

So if a real problem related to package reference counting is triggered, the problem should be fixed elsewhere IMO.
See this bug for reference:
https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1336

Thanks and best regards
Lv

> From: Moore, Robert
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] acpica: Fix double-free in acpi_ns_repair_CID()
> 
> Here's the sequence of events as I see it:
> 
> Repair_HID is a standalone function that removes one reference on the incoming object. For simple _HID
> objects, this in fact deletes the object.
> 
> For _CID, all elements of the package are examined. If a repair was made on a _HID within the _CID
> function, one reference on the original object was removed by Repair_HID. However, since the object is
> part of a package, it has an extra reference to reflect this fact. Thus, in the case in question, the
> elements of the package all have at least two references. Repair_HID removes one reference, thus the
> extra RemoveReference is needed in Repair_CID to bring the reference count down to zero actually
> delete the object (in the typical case where the object had two references).
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> > From: João Paulo Rechi Vita [mailto:jprvita@gmail.com]
> > Subject: [PATCH] acpica: Fix double-free in acpi_ns_repair_CID()
> >
> > When acpi_ns_repair_CID() is called for a _CID which returns a package of
> > strings, it calls acpi_ns_repair_HID() for each of the package elements.
> > acpi_ns_repair_HID() calls acpi_ut_remove_reference() on the original
> > object, but acpi_ns_repair_CID() calls it again on return, leading to a
> > double free.
> >
> > This problem was seen on a Acer TravelMate P449-G2-MG.
> >
> > Thanks to Daniel Drake for helping investigating this problem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@endlessm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c
> > b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c index d5336122486b..c429c8eca476 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c
> > @@ -411,8 +411,6 @@ acpi_ns_repair_CID(struct acpi_evaluate_info *info,
> >
> >  			(*element_ptr)->common.reference_count =
> >  			    original_ref_count;
> > -
> > -			acpi_ut_remove_reference(original_element);
> >  		}
> >
> >  		element_ptr++;
> > --
> > 2.11.0

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] acpica: Fix double-free in acpi_ns_repair_CID() "João Paulo Rechi Vita" <jprvita@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 22:00 +0100
  RE: [PATCH] acpica: Fix double-free in acpi_ns_repair_CID() "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com> - 2017-02-04 05:20 +0100
    RE: [PATCH] acpica: Fix double-free in acpi_ns_repair_CID() "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-02-06 02:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] acpica: Fix double-free in acpi_ns_repair_CID() Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com> - 2017-02-06 16:10 +0100

csiph-web