Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1572076
| From | Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook |
| Date | 2017-02-02 00:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t6cP0-4om-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <t5A70-5JM-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5IQW-2qi-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6aau-2uM-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6atP-2Vw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6cFk-4kV-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure if it is better. The difference is caught up in net_enable_timestamp(), > which is called setsockopt() path and sk_clone() path, so we could be > in netstamp_needed state for a long time too until user-space exercises > these paths. > > I am feeling we probably need to get rid of netstamp_needed_deferred, > and simply defer the whole static_key_slow_dec(), like the attached patch > (compile only). > > What do you think? I think we need to keep the atomic. If two cpus call net_disable_timestamp() roughly at the same time, the work will be scheduled once.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 07:30 +0100
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 16:50 +0100
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-02-01 22:00 +0100
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-01 22:20 +0100
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-01 22:30 +0100
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 00:40 +0100
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> - 2017-02-02 00:50 +0100
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 01:00 +0100
Re: net: suspicious RCU usage in nf_hook Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 19:10 +0100
csiph-web