Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1571878
| From | Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log |
| Date | 2017-02-01 19:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t67Pj-W0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <t5gL0-2ll-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5KJ4-3yR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5NGW-5im-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5NGW-5im-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5XGi-2WB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo |
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:01:06PM +0530, Nayna wrote: > > > On 02/01/2017 02:20 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:14:12AM +0530, Nayna wrote: > > > > I already sent my pull request to 4.11 and even today I found something > > > > fishy. You declared a function local array by using a variable in "tpm: > > > > enhance TPM 2.0 PCR extend to support multiple banks" (max_active_banks > > > > or something). And the event log patches have just passed the review. > > > > > > Yes. I have checked using clang and it has passed the clang.. and I also > > > verified there were no complains during build. > > > > What we can deduce from that is that they didn't expose the issue in > > question. > > > > I found this by running sparse with make C=2 M=drives/char/tpm > > > > > What type of problem do you see ? > > > > It is disallowed to do stack allocation in the kernel code even if C > > standard would allow it. Stack is scarce resource so you need to know > > its usage at compile time. > > > > In this case you actually know the allocation because the value is not > > changed during the course of the function but it is still bad. Probably > > compiler will optimize it out. Still it is not a good practice. > > Thanks Jarkko for explaining it. > > Hmm, do you want me to send a patch for this ? > I think what we want is actually define it just array of size as 7. No but please test my tree and check that it still works. /Jarkko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-31 18:50 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-31 21:40 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2017-01-31 22:50 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-31 23:40 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-02-01 04:50 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-01 11:40 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-02-01 14:50 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-01 19:30 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-31 22:00 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-02-01 08:40 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-01 19:30 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-01 15:50 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-01 16:00 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-02-01 20:30 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-01 21:00 +0100
Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-31 22:00 +0100
csiph-web