Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1569792
| From | Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs |
| Date | 2017-01-30 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5lrk-595-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t45oB-7qU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t4hSO-6xB-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <t4jUC-7Mf-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <t54qu-3fy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Chris, On dim., janv. 29 2017, Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote: > On 28/01/17 07:47, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 01/27, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On ven., janv. 27 2017, Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote: >>> >>>> The 98DX3236, 98DX3336 and 98DX4251 are a set of switch ASICs with >>>> integrated CPUs. They CPU block is common within these product lines and >>>> (as far as I can tell/have been told) is based on the Armada XP. There >>>> are a few differences due to the fact they have to squeeze the CPU into >>>> the same package as the switch. >>>> >>>> I've rebased this series against linux-pinctrl/devel to get access to >>>> mvebu_mmio_mpp_ctrl. Everything else still applies cleanly to >>>> v4.10.0-rc5. >>> >>> Just to let you know that I plan to apply the 3 arm patch once Chris >>> will have sent the new series with the minor fixes I asked on patch 3. >>> >>> I already applied them in the for-next branch to benefit of some build >>> test coverage. >>> >>> Stephen, >>> >>> you gave your Acked-by on the first patch, but don't you plan to apply >>> it on the clk branch? >> >> It must have not been clear if I should apply it, hence the ack. >> I'll apply it now. >> > > Sorry my bad. I need all 5 together in one place to actually test the > series. The 5 patches should be available soon (if it is not already the case), in the linux-next branch. The clk patch is already there, the 3 arm patch have been merged in my mvebu/for-next branch, and the pinctrl patch is about to be merged in the pinctrl/for-next branch. Gregory > > I wasn't sure whether the series should go through mvebu with Acks from > clk and pinctrl or if things should go to the separate maintainers and > come together when they hit the main linux repo. Up until the latest > pinctrl change either approach would have worked. -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> - 2017-01-27 04:30 +0100
[PATCHv5 5/5] arm: mvebu: Add device tree for db-dxbc2 and db-xc3-24g4xg boards Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> - 2017-01-27 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 5/5] arm: mvebu: Add device tree for db-dxbc2 and db-xc3-24g4xg boards Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-27 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-27 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-27 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-01-27 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> - 2017-01-29 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-30 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> - 2017-01-30 21:30 +0100
csiph-web