Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1569762
| Path | csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/9] rhashtable: simplify a strange allocation pattern |
| Date | Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:10:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5kOC-4Wr-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t5gUF-2oF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5gUG-2oF-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 50 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:04:43 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <42a48532-23f5-f965-1e14-aa4b292b13cd@suse.cz> |
| X-Original-References | <20170130094940.13546-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20170130094940.13546-4-mhocko@kernel.org> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1569762 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 01/30/2017 10:49 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> alloc_bucket_locks allocation pattern is quite unusual. We are
> preferring vmalloc when CONFIG_NUMA is enabled. The rationale is that
> vmalloc will respect the memory policy of the current process and so the
> backing memory will get distributed over multiple nodes if the requester
> is configured properly. At least that is the intention, in reality
> rhastable is shrunk and expanded from a kernel worker so no mempolicy
> can be assumed.
>
> Let's just simplify the code and use kvmalloc helper, which is a
> transparent way to use kmalloc with vmalloc fallback, if the caller
> is allowed to block and use the flag otherwise.
>
> Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> lib/rhashtable.c | 13 +++----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
> index 32d0ad058380..1a487ea70829 100644
> --- a/lib/rhashtable.c
> +++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
> @@ -77,16 +77,9 @@ static int alloc_bucket_locks(struct rhashtable *ht, struct bucket_table *tbl,
> size = min_t(unsigned int, size, tbl->size >> 1);
>
> if (sizeof(spinlock_t) != 0) {
> - tbl->locks = NULL;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> - if (size * sizeof(spinlock_t) > PAGE_SIZE &&
> - gfp == GFP_KERNEL)
> - tbl->locks = vmalloc(size * sizeof(spinlock_t));
> -#endif
> - if (gfp != GFP_KERNEL)
> - gfp |= __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY;
> -
> - if (!tbl->locks)
> + if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
> + tbl->locks = kvmalloc(size * sizeof(spinlock_t), gfp);
> + else
> tbl->locks = kmalloc_array(size, sizeof(spinlock_t),
> gfp);
> if (!tbl->locks)
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 3/9] rhashtable: simplify a strange allocation pattern Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-30 11:00 +0100 Re: [PATCH 3/9] rhashtable: simplify a strange allocation pattern Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-30 15:10 +0100
csiph-web