Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1571179
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 |
| Date | 2017-01-31 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5OWm-6cJ-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t5JWG-33f-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5Otj-5NY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5Otj-5NY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, Linus. On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:41:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Linus Torvalds > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > I've pulled this, but I really think it's papering over the real > > issue. Adding "linux-arch" mailing list to ask architecture > > maintainers to check their implementation of the atomic ops that > > return a truth value. Yeah, for sure. > For example, looking at the x86-32 version, I see this: > > static inline int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u) > ... > return (int)a; > > which looks really horribly wrong, but the assembly implementation > actually returns 0/1 in %eax so it ends up being right - just > confusingly so. > > Also, to make things more confusing, the underscore version > (__atomic_add_unless()) actually returns the old value, not the truth > value of the comparison. > > So this area definitely is messy. The x86-64 versions actually look > fairly clean and return nice boolean values. We have a similar mess with bitops too. x86 is cleaned up to have bool returns but the generic implementation and a lot of other archs return the tested bit instead of 1/0. It'd be great to make all the boolean functions actually return bool. Thanks. -- tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-31 18:00 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-01-31 22:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-01-31 22:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-31 23:20 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-31 23:30 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-01 01:40 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-01-31 23:30 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2017-02-01 09:00 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v4.10-rc6 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2017-02-01 11:10 +0100
csiph-web