Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1570899

Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write()

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write()
Date 2017-01-31 18:00 +0100
Message-ID <t5JWG-33f-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t5rGq-Ac-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5EtZ-8qc-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5IQW-2qi-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 12:40:03AM +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote:

> Now allow me going on the second test (based upon Peter's patch)
> 
> - two rwsem, rwA and rwB.
> - the locking order is rwA first, and then rwB.
> - good case
>   down_read(rwA)
>   down_read(rwB)
>   up_read(rwB)
>   up_read(rwA)
> 
>   down_write(rwA)
>   down_write(rwB)
>   up_write(rwB)
>   up_write(rwA)
> 
> - questionable case
>   down_write(rwA)
>   down_write(rwB)
>   downgrade_write(rwA)
>   downgrade_write(rwB)
>   up_read(rwB)
>   up_read(rwA)
> 
> These two downgrade_write() have their strict order? If so, what is
> that?
> Do the added two lines
> +	rwsem_release(&sem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
> +	rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> produce a traditional AB-BA deadlock warning, don't they?

Blergh, yes, because we do a full release.

Does something like the below work better? The annotation in
downgrade_write() would look something like:

+	lock_downgrade(&sem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);

Not even compile tested and lacks the !LOCKDEP build bits.

---
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 1e327bb..76cf149 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -361,6 +361,8 @@ static inline void lock_set_subclass(struct lockdep_map *lock,
 	lock_set_class(lock, lock->name, lock->key, subclass, ip);
 }
 
+extern void lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, int read, unsigned long ip);
+
 extern void lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_t gfp_mask);
 extern void lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state(void);
 extern void lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t mask);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 7c38f8f..88517b6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3488,6 +3488,63 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int __lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, int read, unsigned long ip)
+{
+	struct task_struct *curr = current;
+	struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock;
+	struct lock_class *class;
+	unsigned int depth;
+	int i;
+
+	depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
+	/*
+	 * This function is about (re)setting the class of a held lock,
+	 * yet we're not actually holding any locks. Naughty user!
+	 */
+	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth))
+		return 0;
+
+	prev_hlock = NULL;
+	for (i = depth-1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
+		/*
+		 * We must not cross into another context:
+		 */
+		if (prev_hlock && prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)
+			break;
+		if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock))
+			goto found_it;
+		prev_hlock = hlock;
+	}
+	return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
+
+found_it:
+	curr->lockdep_depth = i;
+	curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
+
+	WARN(hlock->read, "downgrading a read lock");
+	hlock->read = read;
+	hlock->acquire_ip = ip;
+
+	for (; i < depth; i++) {
+		hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
+		if (!__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
+			hlock_class(hlock)->subclass, hlock->trylock,
+				hlock->read, hlock->check, hlock->hardirqs_off,
+				hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip,
+				hlock->references, hlock->pin_count))
+			return 0;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * I took it apart and put it back together again, except now I have
+	 * these 'spare' parts.. where shall I put them.
+	 */
+	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth))
+		return 0;
+	return 1;
+}
+
 /*
  * Remove the lock to the list of currently held locks - this gets
  * called on mutex_unlock()/spin_unlock*() (or on a failed
@@ -3732,6 +3789,23 @@ void lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_set_class);
 
+void lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, int read, unsigned long ip)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
+		return;
+
+	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	check_flags(flags);
+	if (__lock_downgrade(lock, read, ip))
+		check_chain_key(current);
+	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_downgrade);
+
 /*
  * We are not always called with irqs disabled - do that here,
  * and also avoid lockdep recursion:

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 22:30 +0100
  Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-31 12:10 +0100
    Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-31 15:00 +0100
      Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-01-31 15:30 +0100
        Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-31 15:30 +0100
  Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 16:50 +0100
    Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-31 18:00 +0100
      Re: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 17:40 +0100
      [PATCH 1/3] lockdep: consolidate by new find_held_lock() "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 17:50 +0100
        [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: new annotation lock_downgrade() "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 17:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: new annotation lock_downgrade() kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2017-02-02 19:10 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: new annotation lock_downgrade() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-02 19:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: new annotation lock_downgrade() "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 22:10 +0100
        [PATCH 2/3] lockdep: consolidate by new validate_held_lock() "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 17:50 +0100

csiph-web