Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support, for TPM 2.0 firmware event log

From	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support, for TPM 2.0 firmware event log
Date	2017-01-31 14:20 +0100
Message-ID	<t5GvL-19j-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<t3DiG-76w-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:22:45PM -0500, Ken Goldman wrote:
> > You do not need to send a new patch set version as long as this
> > one gets peer tested. And it needs to be tested without hacks
> > like plumbing TCPA with TPM 2.0 in QEMU. OF code paths needs to
> > be peer tested to be more specific.
> >
> > For me the code itself looks good but I simply cannot take it in
> > in the current situation.
> >
> > /Jarkko
> 
> Tested-by: Kenneth Goldman <kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks. This explains it. I got Naynas response before I got this one.
That's why it went unnoticed.

/Jarkko

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support, for  TPM 2.0 firmware event log Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-31 14:20 +0100

csiph-web