Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1567795
| From | Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages |
| Date | 2017-01-27 00:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t41uF-56e-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <t40yC-4uo-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <t40Ih-4A6-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t40RX-4En-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t41bk-4KV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t41uF-56e-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > Hi Stephane, > > > On 2017-01-26 14:51:02 -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> Ok, I think I see the problem now (sorry was slow....): > > No worries ;) > > >> the timeline is as follows as seen from the user in your case: >> >> T0: mmap(0x1000) for func1() >> T1 mmap(0x2000) for func1(); >> T3: jit emits info func1() [0x1000-0x1fff] >> T4: mmap(0x3000) for func2() >> T5: mmap(0x4000) for funcs2() >> T6: jit emits info for func2() [0x2000-0x3fff] >> >> But the problem is that each mmap covers existing mmaps and thus >> supersedes the others as per the time stamp. > > Yes, I think that's whats happening. Not that I actually know what I'm > talking about here :) > > >> The problem is not specific to jit, it just reveals itself in your case. >> >> The logic in perf is that a more recent mmap supersedes an older one, >> so you have: >> T3: 0x1000-0x2000 owned by func1 >> T4: 0x1000-0x3000 owned by anon >> T5: 0x1000-0x4000 owned by anon >> T6: 0x1000-0x4000 owned partially by func2() >> >> And thus perf cannot symbolize func1() anymore because it has nothing >> mapped in 0x1000-0x1fff but anon. >> >> Did I get the problem right this time? > > Yep. > > >> This is tricky to solve here because the tool does not know about the >> merging of the VMAs and assume you are overlapping mmaps and not >> merging them. > > Yea, it looked tricky. I'd looked around and the only solutions I'd > found was filtering out the anon mappings (obviously not a real > solution) or preventing the merging (not a real solution either). > One solution would be for the kernel to report actual mmaps and not resulting VMA layouts. Is that case you would have your 4 mmaps each reporting 4kb. That means the perf hook in the mmap code would have to be placed somewhere else. I don't know how feasible this is. I will let Peter comment on this. But hopefully by now, I have described the problem clearly enough that we can work out a solution. > >> Again the problem is not specific to jit, merging of VMA can happen >> anytime with any app. > > Sorry if I hinted in the wrong direction - I didn't see any other bad > consequences. I guess in most other cases with merged VMAs its > relatively harmless, since it'll presumably mostly be memory allocations > and such, where this wont matter. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com> - 2017-01-26 21:50 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> - 2017-01-26 22:10 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-01-26 22:20 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> - 2017-01-26 22:30 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-01-26 22:40 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> - 2017-01-26 23:00 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-26 23:20 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-01-26 23:30 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> - 2017-01-26 23:40 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-01-27 00:00 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> - 2017-01-27 00:20 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-01-27 00:20 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-27 14:10 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-01-27 16:50 +0100
Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-01-27 18:40 +0100
[PATCH] handle munmap records in tools/perf was: Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-01-27 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] handle munmap records in tools/perf was: Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com> - 2017-01-27 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] handle munmap records in tools/perf was: Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com> - 2017-01-27 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] handle munmap records in tools/perf was: Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-01-27 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] handle munmap records in tools/perf was: Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com> - 2017-01-27 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] handle munmap records in tools/perf was: Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-01-27 19:40 +0100
csiph-web