Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1566437

Re: [PATCH v8 9/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs

From Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v8 9/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs
Date 2017-01-25 11:00 +0100
Message-ID <t3swW-6x-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t0E1A-mt-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t2wsV-4Uh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3sng-8uI-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:46:53AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Which is absolutely insane.

Right,

IMO, the simplest thing to do for your purposes is to embed a struct
amd_iommu pointer into struct perf_amd_iommu at init time so that you
don't have to do all that crazy dance in the PMU functions and iterate
over the iommus in get_amd_iommu() each time.

Which would then simplify all your other functions. For example:

int amd_iommu_pc_get_reg(unsigned int idx, u8 bank, u8 cntr, u8 fxn, u64 *value)

should be

int amd_iommu_pc_get_reg(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u8 bank, u8 cntr, u8 fxn, u64 *value)

and you can save yourself a lot of glue code and get rid of that
get_amd_iommu() thing.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v8 9/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-25 10:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v8 9/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-01-25 11:00 +0100

csiph-web