Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1567648
| From | "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix returnvar.cocci warnings |
| Date | 2017-01-26 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3X7I-2kP-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t3Oxs-5zz-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:20:58AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Remove unneeded variable used to store return value.
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/returnvar.cocci
>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Is it correct to be returning 0 in the level == 0 case?
Yes, because level == 0 is the root node for xfs dir/attr btree cursors
(which is confusing since level == 0 are leaf nodes for the regular xfs
btree cursors). Therefore if level == 0 we're at the root and there are
no parent hash values to check.
That said, you're absolutely right that we don't need the intermediate
variable in either function.
--D
>
> dabtree.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/dabtree.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ xfs_scrub_da_btree_hash(
> struct xfs_da_node_entry *btree;
> xfs_dahash_t hash;
> xfs_dahash_t parent_hash;
> - int error = 0;
>
> /* Is this hash in order? */
> hash = be32_to_cpu(*hashp);
> @@ -104,7 +103,7 @@ xfs_scrub_da_btree_hash(
> ds->hashes[level] = hash;
>
> if (level == 0)
> - return error;
> + return 0;
>
> /* Is this hash no larger than the parent hash? */
> blks = ds->state->path.blk;
> @@ -112,7 +111,7 @@ xfs_scrub_da_btree_hash(
> parent_hash = be32_to_cpu(btree->hashval);
> XFS_SCRUB_DA_CHECK(ds, hash <= parent_hash);
>
> - return error;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* Scrub a da btree pointer. */
> @@ -122,12 +121,10 @@ xfs_scrub_da_btree_ptr(
> int level,
> xfs_dablk_t blkno)
> {
> - int error = 0;
> -
> XFS_SCRUB_DA_CHECK(ds, blkno >= ds->lowest);
> XFS_SCRUB_DA_CHECK(ds, ds->highest == 0 || blkno < ds->highest);
>
> - return error;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] xfs: fix returnvar.cocci warnings Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-01-26 10:30 +0100 Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix returnvar.cocci warnings "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> - 2017-01-26 19:40 +0100
csiph-web