Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1567488
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: How to ensure other module/driver is initialized? |
| Date | 2017-01-26 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3TGO-cu-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sOKma-1u7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t391g-4Ik-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3cs9-6Gn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com> wrote: > Device tree presents even greater problems. It's not clear to me that > device tree even works with x86_64, and even if it does, I'm almost > positive that none of the "generic" distributions are going to support > it. > > If my understanding of device tree is inaccurate, please do let me > know. I'd definitely like to replace the "board" module with a > device tree description if it's possible. Sorry for my ignorance. I thought this was some ARM or MIPS thing. It should indeed come in as a board file for x86 systems, unless they have ACPI to do what DT does on other platforms, which modern systems do. The way on these systems is to put a file in drivers/platform/x86/* I think, but I know too little about x86 for that. I do think it'll be accepted upstream nevertheless, we do not really count users but rather check whether the code is nice and maintainable. Yours, Linus Walleij
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How to ensure other module/driver is initialized? Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-01-24 14:10 +0100
Re: How to ensure other module/driver is initialized? Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com> - 2017-01-24 17:50 +0100
Re: How to ensure other module/driver is initialized? Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-01-26 16:00 +0100
csiph-web