Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1567074

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the userns tree

From Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the userns tree
Date 2017-01-26 02:50 +0100
Message-ID <t3Hmh-16B-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t3o0h-5TO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3GJz-SE-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:59:23 +1300 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   fs/proc/base.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   68eb94f16227 ("proc: Better ownership of files for non-dumpable tasks in user namespaces")
> >
> > from the userns tree and commit:
> >
> >   d15d29b5352f ("procfs: change the owner of non-dumpable and writeable files")
> >
> > from the akpm-current tree.
> >
> > I *think* that the former supercedes the latter?
> 
> Sort of.  After a long conversation it turns out what they are trying to
> do is orthogonal.
> 
> The first (mine) is handling the case of non-dumpable tasks in user
> namespaces.
> 
> The second by Aleksa Sarai is trying to trying to relax the permission
> checks in proc so that non-dumpable is not as strict, to sort out some
> runC issues where they are having challenges coding themselves into a
> corner.  In the case of /proc/self I think there may be a case but in
> general relaxing the permission checks in proc gives me the Heebie
> Jeebies.
> 
> Andrew do you see merit in Aleksa's patch that I don't?  Otherwise can
> you remove it from your tree?

I have done so.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the userns  tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-25 06:10 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the userns tree ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-01-26 02:10 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the  userns tree Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-01-26 02:50 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the  userns tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-26 05:00 +0100

csiph-web