Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1565509
| From | Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers |
| Date | 2017-01-24 08:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t33fc-T4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t2I14-40Y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t2M4G-6rG-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <t2Ozx-84K-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <t2OJc-885-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Am 23.01.2017 um 16:24 schrieb Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:14:51 +0000 > Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> wrote: > >>> I maintain my own stack of "linuxdoc" with a python version >>> of the kernel-doc script (hosted on github). It uses the same >>> regexes as the perl version (using a python rewrite here has some >>> other benefits, one you will see below). I merged your patch: >> >> Are there plans to merge that? It feels so odd to have a python script calling a perl script ... > > I pushed back pretty hard on it last year; my feeling at the time was that > the Sphinx transition had enough moving parts as it was. I know what you mean ;) > I do think we > can reconsider it now, though. It's not as if the perl kerneldoc script > is a thing of great beauty in need of preservation. > > Markus, would you consider sending out a new patch set for review? Yes, I send RFC soon ... > What I > would like to do see is something adding the new script for the Sphinx > toolchain, while leaving the DocBook build unchanged, using the old > script. We could then delete it once the last template file has moved > over. agree ... > 4.12 would be the probable merge target; it's a big enough change that I'd > like to have it in -next for a full development cycle. agree once more. Thanks for choosing this! -- Markus --
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> - 2017-01-23 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> - 2017-01-23 13:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> - 2017-01-23 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-23 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> - 2017-01-24 08:00 +0100
RE: [PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> - 2017-01-24 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> - 2017-01-24 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: Handle returning pointers to pointers Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-26 23:30 +0100
csiph-web