Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1562982
| From | Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192x: Enabling and disabling hardware interrupts after enabling local irq flags |
| Date | 2017-01-19 19:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t1pjP-4Uj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t1mch-2Mr-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t1mch-2Mr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/19/2017 08:35 AM, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> altek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
>> index a47be73..143766c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
>> @@ -1306,9 +1306,9 @@ void rtl92ce_enable_interrupt(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>> struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
>> struct rtl_pci *rtlpci = rtl_pcidev(rtl_pcipriv(hw));
>>
>> + rtlpci->irq_enabled = true;
>> rtl_write_dword(rtlpriv, REG_HIMR, rtlpci->irq_mask[0] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> rtl_write_dword(rtlpriv, REG_HIMRE, rtlpci->irq_mask[1] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> - rtlpci->irq_enabled = true;
>> }
>>
>> void rtl92ce_disable_interrupt(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>> @@ -1316,9 +1316,9 @@ void rtl92ce_disable_interrupt(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>> struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
>> struct rtl_pci *rtlpci = rtl_pcidev(rtl_pcipriv(hw));
>>
>> + rtlpci->irq_enabled = false;
>> rtl_write_dword(rtlpriv, REG_HIMR, IMR8190_DISABLED);
>> rtl_write_dword(rtlpriv, REG_HIMRE, IMR8190_DISABLED);
>> - rtlpci->irq_enabled = false;
>> }
>>
>
> AFAIK you also have to use memory barriers here to ensure that
> the concerning instructions are not reordered, and both irq handler
> and process have a consistent perception of irq_enabled, e.g:
>
> rtlpci->irq_enabled = true;
> smp_wmb();
> rtl_write_dword(rtlpriv, REG_HIMR, rtlpci->irq_mask[0] & 0xFFFFFFFF);
>
> and in the irq handler
>
> if (rtlpci->irq_enabled == 0) {
> smp_rmb();
> return ret;
> }
I can see the potential race condition between setting interrupts and setting
the flag, and I will likely accept Bharat's patch after testing.
I am likely displaying my ignorance regarding instruction reordering, but what
compiler/cpu combination is likely to move a simple set operation after a call
to an external routine? Is the smp_wmb() operation really needed? I am also
unsure of the smp_rmb() call in the interrupt handler. Neither instruction
should cause any problems, but I'm not sure they are needed.
Larry
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192x: Enabling and disabling hardware interrupts after enabling local irq flags "Lino Sanfilippo" <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> - 2017-01-19 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192x: Enabling and disabling hardware interrupts after enabling local irq flags Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> - 2017-01-19 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192x: Enabling and disabling hardware interrupts after enabling local irq flags Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> - 2017-01-19 23:30 +0100
csiph-web