Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1562540
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers |
| Date | 2017-01-19 11:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t1hFE-8hK-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <t0RBv-oA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0TN0-1Eh-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <t1gqe-7Ax-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <t1gTg-805-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <t1h2V-83w-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu 19-01-17 01:09:35, John Hubbard wrote: [...] > So that leaves us with maybe this for documentation? > > * Reclaim modifiers - __GFP_NORETRY and __GFP_NOFAIL should not be passed in. > * Passing in __GFP_REPEAT is supported, and will cause the following behavior: > * for larger (>64KB) allocations, the first part (kmalloc) will do some > * retrying, before falling back to vmalloc. I am worried this is just too vague. It doesn't really help user to decide whether "do some retrying" is what he really want's or needs. So I would rather see the following. " * Reclaim modifiers - __GFP_NORETRY and __GFP_NOFAIL are not supported. __GFP_REPEAT * is supported only for large (>32kB) allocations and it should be used when using * kmalloc is preferable because vmalloc fallback has visible performance drawbacks. " I would also add " Any use of gfp flags outside of GFP_KERNEL should be consulted with mm people. " Does it sound any better? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-16 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> - 2017-01-16 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-16 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> - 2017-01-16 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-17 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> - 2017-01-18 07:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-18 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> - 2017-01-19 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-19 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> - 2017-01-19 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-19 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> - 2017-01-19 22:30 +0100
csiph-web