Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1563487

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO scheduler

From Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 7/8] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO scheduler
Date 2017-01-20 12:10 +0100
Message-ID <t1FeW-6vs-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sPaTf-2bJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sPaTf-2bJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sReSJ-3uM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t1FeW-6vs-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> Il giorno 17 gen 2017, alle ore 03:47, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> ha scritto:
> 
> On 12/22/2016 09:49 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> 
>>> Il giorno 17 dic 2016, alle ore 01:12, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>> This is basically identical to deadline-iosched, except it registers
>>> as a MQ capable scheduler. This is still a single queue design.
>>> 
>> 
>> One last question (for today ...):in mq-deadline there are no
>> "schedule dispatch" or "unplug work" functions.  In blk, CFQ and BFQ
>> do these schedules/unplugs in a lot of cases.  What's the right
>> replacement?  Just doing nothing?
> 
> You just use blk_mq_run_hw_queue() or variants thereof to kick off queue
> runs.
> 

Hi Jens,
I'm working on this right now.  I have a pair of quick questions about
performance.

In the blk version of bfq, if the in-service bfq_queue happen to have
no more budget when the bfq dispatch function is invoked, then bfq:
returns no request (NULL), immediately expires the in-service
bfq_queue, and schedules a new dispatch.  The third step is taken so
that, if other bfq_queues have requests, then a new in-service
bfq_queue will be selected on the upcoming new dispatch, and a new
request will be provided right away.

My questions are: is this dispatch-schedule step still needed with
blk-mq, to avoid a stall?  If it is not needed to avoid a stall, would
it still be needed to boost throughput, because it would force an
immediate, next dispatch?

BTW, bfq-mq survived its first request completion.  I will provide you
with a link to a github branch as soon as bfq-mq seems able to stand
up with a minimal workload.

Thanks,
Paolo

> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO scheduler Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2017-01-20 12:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 7/8] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline  IO scheduler Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> - 2017-01-20 15:30 +0100

csiph-web