Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1562066
| From | Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] netfilter: ctnetlink: Fix regression in CTA_TIMEOUT processing |
| Date | 2017-01-18 20:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t13CG-7H3-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t0ulz-2IQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0ulA-2IQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org> wrote:
> Commit b7bd1809e078 ("netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: get rid of
> nfnetlink_queue_ct.c") introduced a new check on the return value
> from the NFQA_CT parser (currently ctnetlink_glue_parse_ct()).
> Prior to Linux 4.4, nfqnl_ct_parse() would process the NFQA_EXP
> attribute even if there were errors in the NFQA_CT attribute.
> After Linux 4.4, this is no longer true, so any error in the NFQA_CT
> attribute will cause the kernel to silently fail to create an
> expectation.
>
> The new check is causing user conntrack helpers to fail. If a user
> program sends an NFQA_CT attribute containing a CTA_TIMEOUT attribute
> before the connection is confirmed (i.e. before the initial
> ACCEPT/DROP decision has been made), del_timer() in
> ctnetlink_change_timeout() will fail, and all further processing will be
> aborted. The (simplified) calling sequence looks like:
>
> nfnetlink_rcv_msg
> nfqnl_recv_verdict
> nfqnl_ct_parse
> ctnetlink_glue_parse_ct
> ctnetlink_change_timeout
> del_timer [ERROR]
> nf_reinject
> __nf_conntrack_confirm
>
> Fix this by adding a case to ctnetlink_change_timeout() to handle
> unconfirmed connections.
>
> Also, if a timeout of 0 is set for an unconfirmed connection, restore the
> old behavior of ignoring it (rather than setting up a connection that
> expires immediately).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I'm not an expert (I'd never looked at netlink code before yesterday),
but Kevin's explanation and proposal seem sane to me. In case it's
helpful:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC/PATCH 0/3] Fix ctnetlink regressions Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org> - 2017-01-17 06:20 +0100
[RFC/PATCH 2/3] netfilter: ctnetlink: Fix regression in CTA_STATUS processing Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org> - 2017-01-17 06:20 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] netfilter: ctnetlink: Fix regression in CTA_STATUS processing Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2017-01-18 20:10 +0100
[RFC/PATCH 1/3] netfilter: ctnetlink: Fix regression in CTA_TIMEOUT processing Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org> - 2017-01-17 06:20 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] netfilter: ctnetlink: Fix regression in CTA_TIMEOUT processing Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2017-01-18 20:00 +0100
Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] Fix ctnetlink regressions Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> - 2017-01-25 01:40 +0100
csiph-web