Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1560331

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

From Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel
Date 2017-01-17 09:20 +0100
Message-ID <t0x9L-4At-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <sYLAe-3jp-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ1OF-4L0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ61X-7rG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0d1o-7E3-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0fwf-WM-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 01/16/2017 02:22 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>>
>>>  no_zone:
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>>>
>>
>> this patch did not fix the issue.
>> issue still exists!
> 
> Hmm, that's unfortunate.
> 
>> i did bisect and this test passes in 4.4,4.5 and 4.6
>> test failing since 4.7-rc1
> 
> 4.7 would match the commit I was trying to fix. But I don't see other
> problems now. Could you bisect to a single commit then, to be sure? Thanks.

Ah, nevermind, I can reproduce the issue easily. After some more poking
I now think the bisect would lead to the OOM rework, but it would be a
red herring. Seems like this is an interaction between bind mempolicy
and cpuset and I see several potential bugs in that area. Which also
means there's a non-null nodemask and thus the code in the commit I
originally suspected (replacing NULL nodemask with cpuset's
mems_allowed) doesn't trigger at all here.

Thanks,
Vlastimil

>> thanks
>> Ganapat
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 12:00 +0100
  Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-11 12:10 +0100
    Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-11 13:40 +0100
      Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-11 17:50 +0100
        Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-12 12:20 +0100
          Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 05:40 +0100
            Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-13 10:10 +0100
              Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-13 17:00 +0100
              Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2017-01-16 11:50 +0100
                Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-16 14:30 +0100
                Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-17 09:20 +0100
    Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-11 17:40 +0100
  Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-11 17:40 +0100

csiph-web