Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1560331
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel |
| Date | 2017-01-17 09:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0x9L-4At-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <sYLAe-3jp-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ1OF-4L0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZ61X-7rG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0d1o-7E3-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0fwf-WM-53@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/16/2017 02:22 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> >>> no_zone: >>> -- >>> 2.11.0 >>> >> >> this patch did not fix the issue. >> issue still exists! > > Hmm, that's unfortunate. > >> i did bisect and this test passes in 4.4,4.5 and 4.6 >> test failing since 4.7-rc1 > > 4.7 would match the commit I was trying to fix. But I don't see other > problems now. Could you bisect to a single commit then, to be sure? Thanks. Ah, nevermind, I can reproduce the issue easily. After some more poking I now think the bisect would lead to the OOM rework, but it would be a red herring. Seems like this is an interaction between bind mempolicy and cpuset and I see several potential bugs in that area. Which also means there's a non-null nodemask and thus the code in the commit I originally suspected (replacing NULL nodemask with cpuset's mems_allowed) doesn't trigger at all here. Thanks, Vlastimil >> thanks >> Ganapat >>> >>> >>> > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 12:00 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-11 12:10 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-11 13:40 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-11 17:50 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-12 12:20 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 05:40 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-13 10:10 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-13 17:00 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2017-01-16 11:50 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-16 14:30 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-17 09:20 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-11 17:40 +0100
Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-11 17:40 +0100
csiph-web