Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1559929
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state |
| Date | 2017-01-16 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0j6O-3rL-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sZsFb-49R-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZsFc-49R-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:13:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > There is some confusion as to which of cond_resched() or > cond_resched_rcu_qs() should be added to long in-kernel loops. > This commit therefore eliminates the decision by adding RCU > quiescent states to cond_resched(). Which would make: rcu_read_lock(); cond_resched(); rcu_read_unlock(); invalid under preemptible RCU. Is it already? > Warning: This is a prototype. For example, it does not correctly > handle Tasks RCU. Which is OK for the moment, given that no one > actually uses Tasks RCU yet. > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -4907,6 +4907,7 @@ int __sched _cond_resched(void) > preempt_schedule_common(); > return 1; > } > + rcu_all_qs(); > return 0; > } Still not a real fan of this, it does make cond_resched() touch a bunch more cachelines, also, I suppose that if we're going to do this, we should make __cond_resched_lock() and __cond_resched_softirq() act similarly.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-14 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2017-01-16 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-16 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-16 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-17 05:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-17 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-17 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-17 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-18 08:20 +0100
csiph-web