Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1559784

Re: [patch] hfs: fix hfs_readdir()

From Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [patch] hfs: fix hfs_readdir()
Date 2017-01-16 15:30 +0100
Message-ID <t0gsi-1yN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qV86K-23v-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVgnE-7Zo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVhjI-cn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVjOy-1X6-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


I was reviewing old warnings and I stumbled across this one again.
Although I wrote that &fd.key->cat and "fd.key" are equivalent, I feel
that actually we should be doing the former.  fd.key is a union but we
want the ->cat member of the union.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:54:06PM -0800, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 22:18 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Hm, I completely didn't see that it was a union instead of a struct.  I
> > still think my fix is actually correct though.  Now that you point out
> > the union, I see that my change is equivalent to just removing the '&'
> > char.
> > 
> > -	memcpy(&rd->key, &fd.key, sizeof(struct hfs_cat_key));
> > +	memcpy(&rd->key, fd.key, sizeof(struct hfs_cat_key));
> > 
> 
> Yeahh, it looks correct right now. The rd is the pointer that includes
> struct hfs_cat_key object. So, we need to use &rd->key. But on another
> side we have struct hfs_find_data object on the stack. And this object
> includes the pointer on union btree_key. We want to copy struct
> hfs_cat_key object and we should use sizeof(struct hfs_cat_key).

I've read this paragraph several times now and I think you are saying
that the patch is correct.

> 
> > We don't want to copy sizeof(*fd.key) because that would write past the
> > end of the destination struct.
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:18:56AM -0800, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> > > Another worry could be the "search_key" field of the struct
> > > hfs_find_data.
> > 
> > I don't understand what you mean here.
> > 
> 
> I mean here that we could have another incorrect copy operations for
> "search_key" field. That's all.

I don't see the bugs you are saying might exist...  ;)

regards,
dan carpenter

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [patch] hfs: fix hfs_readdir() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-01-16 15:30 +0100
  Re: [patch] hfs: fix hfs_readdir() Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> - 2017-01-16 23:50 +0100

csiph-web