Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1559698

Re: llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang
Date 2017-01-16 14:00 +0100
Message-ID <t0f3b-v1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t00GS-7DV-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0bsB-6yd-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0dXr-8gC-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:42:29PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> > Last I checked I couldn't build a x86_64 kernel with llvm. So no, not
> > something I've ever ran into.
> > 
> > Also, I would argue that this is broken in llvm, the kernel very much
> > relies on things like this all over the place. Sure, we're way outside
> > of what the C language spec says, but who bloody cares ;-)
> 
> True, but is there anything preventing gcc from implementing this
> optimisation in the future? If we are relying on undefined behaviour we
> should have a -fno-strict-* option to cover it.
> 
> > If llvm wants to compile the kernel, it needs to learn the C dialect
> > the kernel uses.
> 
> LLVM has done that before (eg adding -fno-strict-overflow). I don't
> think that option covers this case however.

Our comment there states:

# disable invalid "can't wrap" optimizations for signed / pointers
KBUILD_CFLAGS   += $(call cc-option,-fno-strict-overflow)

So this option should apply to pointer arithmetic, therefore I would
expect -fno-strict-overflow to actually apply here, or am I missing
something?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> - 2017-01-15 22:40 +0100
  Re: llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-16 10:10 +0100
    Re: llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> - 2017-01-16 12:50 +0100
      Re: llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-16 14:00 +0100
        Re: llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> - 2017-01-16 14:10 +0100
  RE: llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2017-01-16 15:40 +0100
    Re: llist code relies on undefined behaviour, upsets llvm/clang Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-16 17:30 +0100

csiph-web