Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1561449

Re: [PATCH v6 kernel 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast (de)inflating & fast live migration

From David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v6 kernel 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast (de)inflating & fast live migration
Date 2017-01-18 11:20 +0100
Message-ID <t0Vvt-2I0-51@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sQJ2x-8nk-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Red Hat GmbH

Show all headers | View raw


Am 21.12.2016 um 07:52 schrieb Liang Li:
> This patch set contains two parts of changes to the virtio-balloon.
>
> One is the change for speeding up the inflating & deflating process,
> the main idea of this optimization is to use {pfn|length} to present
> the page information instead of the PFNs, to reduce the overhead of
> virtio data transmission, address translation and madvise(). This can
> help to improve the performance by about 85%.
>
> Another change is for speeding up live migration. By skipping process
> guest's unused pages in the first round of data copy, to reduce needless
> data processing, this can help to save quite a lot of CPU cycles and
> network bandwidth. We put guest's unused page information in a
> {pfn|length} array and send it to host with the virt queue of
> virtio-balloon. For an idle guest with 8GB RAM, this can help to shorten
> the total live migration time from 2Sec to about 500ms in 10Gbps network
> environment. For an guest with quite a lot of page cache and with little
> unused pages, it's possible to let the guest drop it's page cache before
> live migration, this case can benefit from this new feature too.

I agree that both changes make sense (although the second change just 
smells very racy, as you also pointed out in the patch description),
however I am not sure if virtio-balloon is really the right place for
the latter change.

virtio-balloon is all about ballooning, nothing else. What you're doing
is using it as a way to communicate balloon-unrelated data from/to the
hypervisor. Yes, it is also about guest memory, but completely unrelated
to the purpose of the balloon device.

Maybe using virtio-balloon for this purpose is okay - I have mixed
feelings (especially as I can't tell where else this could go). I would
like to get a second opinion on this.

-- 

David

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v6 kernel 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast  (de)inflating & fast live migration David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-01-18 11:20 +0100
  RE: [PATCH v6 kernel 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast  (de)inflating & fast live migration "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2017-01-18 14:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v6 kernel 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast  (de)inflating & fast live migration "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-01-18 16:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v6 kernel 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast  (de)inflating & fast live migration David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-01-19 18:50 +0100

csiph-web