Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1514897
| From | Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm |
| Date | 2016-11-03 23:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <szyGe-1ul-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <szxTP-UG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <szxTP-UG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <szydd-11E-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/03/2016 02:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:32PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> The current code doesn't even compile ....
>
> Give a better description in the log, especially if this patch is supposed to
> go to stable@
OK.
>
>> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arc/kernel/time.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/time.c b/arch/arc/kernel/time.c
>> index f927b8dc6edd..1a117b999c0c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/time.c
>> @@ -152,14 +152,17 @@ static cycle_t arc_read_rtc(struct clocksource *cs)
>> cycle_t full;
>> } stamp;
>>
>> -
>> - __asm__ __volatile(
>> - "1: \n"
>> - " lr %0, [AUX_RTC_LOW] \n"
>> - " lr %1, [AUX_RTC_HIGH] \n"
>> - " lr %2, [AUX_RTC_CTRL] \n"
>> - " bbit0.nt %2, 31, 1b \n"
>> - : "=r" (stamp.low), "=r" (stamp.high), "=r" (status));
>> + /*
>> + * hardware has an internal state machine which tracks readout of
>> + * low/high and updates the CTRL.status if
>> + * - interrupt/exception taken between the two reads
>> + * - high increments after low has been read
>> + */
>> + do {
>> + stamp.low = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_LOW);
>> + stamp.high = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_HIGH);
>> + status = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_CTRL);
>> + } while (!(status & _BITUL(31)));
>
> Is the condition correct ? If I refer to your previous answer, the bit will be
> set for status if the counter wrapped up. So in this case, we won't exit the
> loop until we wrap up, no ?
No thats not what I meant. Bit being set there means things are fine (no interrupt
taken, no increment of high after low was readetc). All I changed here was use of
0x8000_0000 to the macro. BBIT0 in assembler means branch if bit was clear.
>
>> return stamp.full;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 00/10] Move ARC timer code into drivers/clocksource/ Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
[PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-11-03 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-11-03 23:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-11-03 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 23:50 +0100
RE: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-04 19:00 +0100
[PATCH v2 05/10] ARC: time: move time_init() out of the driver Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
[PATCH v2 07/10] ARC: breakout aux handling into a separate header Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
[PATCH v2 08/10] ARC: move mcip.h into include/soc and adjust the includes Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
[PATCH v2 02/10] ARC: timer: gfrc, rtc: deuglify big endian code Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] ARC: timer: gfrc, rtc: deuglify big endian code Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-11-03 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] ARC: timer: gfrc, rtc: deuglify big endian code Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 23:20 +0100
RE: [PATCH v2 02/10] ARC: timer: gfrc, rtc: deuglify big endian code Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-04 19:20 +0100
[PATCH v2 03/10] ARC: timer: gfrc, rtc: Read BCR to detect whether hardware exists ... Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
[PATCH v2 10/10] clocksource: import ARC timer driver Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] clocksource: import ARC timer driver Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-11-03 23:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] clocksource: import ARC timer driver Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-04 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] clocksource: import ARC timer driver Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-04 00:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] clocksource: import ARC timer driver Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-11-04 00:10 +0100
[PATCH v2 09/10] ARC: breakout timer include code into separate header ... Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
[PATCH v2 04/10] ARC: timer: gfrc: boot print alongside other timers Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
[PATCH v2 06/10] ARC: timer: Build gfrc, rtc under same option (64-bit timers) Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-03 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] ARC: timer: Build gfrc, rtc under same option (64-bit timers) Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-11-03 23:20 +0100
csiph-web