Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1514817
| From | Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field |
| Date | 2016-11-03 21:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <szwO5-i9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <szshs-5Fc-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <szuVX-7xm-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> wrote: >> + case PR_SET_HIDEPID: >> + if (arg2 < HIDEPID_OFF || arg2 > HIDEPID_INVISIBLE) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + if (arg2 < me->hide_pid) >> + return -EPERM; >> + me->hide_pid = arg2; >> + break; > > Should we test for ns_capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)||no_new_privs here? > I think it wouldn't hurt, and I'd like to avoid adding new ways in which > the execution of setuid programs can be influenced. OTOH, people already > use hidepid now, and it's not an issue... I'm not sure. Opinions? Hmm, the existing hidepid= thing is a mount option and that you you of course can only change with root privs so far, hence the NNP thing doesn't really apply so far on hidepid. > @Lafcadio: Do you think that requiring no_new_privs to be set would > break your usecase? Would nginx need to still be able to execute setuid > binaries? I think adding the NNP check would be OK for my use. I'll add this to the next iteration! > Aside from this, and the comments Kees already made, this looks good > to me. Thanks for the review, L.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-11-03 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> - 2016-11-03 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-11-03 19:10 +0100
Re: [2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> - 2016-11-03 19:30 +0100
Re: [2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:30 +0100
Re: [2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-11-03 21:40 +0100
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> - 2016-11-03 21:50 +0100
csiph-web