Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1514296
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 REPOST 0/9] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems |
| Date | Thu, 03 Nov 2016 06:40:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sziUN-87D-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <stikN-5jI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sy5PY-1zc-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 35 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, broonie@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 3 Nov 2016 05:37:52 +0000 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20161103053752.GB16920@e106622-lin> |
| X-Original-References | <20161017154650.18779-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> <20161030142246.od5skjzegyp62hma@localhost> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1514296 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi Catalin, On 30/10/16 14:22, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can > > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please > > speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :). > > Otherwise I'm going to: > > > > - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8 > > - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7 > > - ask Catalin/Will to pull patches 1,4 and 9 > > I'm happy to queue patches 1, 4 and 9 for 4.10 (though it might have > been easier for the whole series to go through arm-soc). > > > Do you think we might get into trouble splitting the merge process this way? > > Probably not. The only minor downside is that I have to grab a new DT > for Juno from Sudeep to test the patches. Not an issue, though. > Thanks and apologies if merging through different trees generates some confusion. I updated arm patches to address Russell's comments. I did the same for arm64. I'll reply with the updated version, so you can see if it looks good to you as well. In case it is OK, I already updated the for-arm64 branch with the new version: git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git upstream/default_caps_for-arm64 Best, - Juri
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v7 REPOST 0/9] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-10-30 22:30 +0100 Re: [PATCH v7 REPOST 0/9] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-11-03 06:40 +0100
csiph-web