Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1513010
| From | David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for local NUMA mode |
| Date | 2016-11-01 01:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <syv7H-1eW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sm0Cl-1As-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <swVSF-4lA-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Piotr Kwapulinski wrote: > The MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES and MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flags are irrelevant > when setting them for MPOL_LOCAL NUMA memory policy via set_mempolicy > or mbind. > Return the "invalid argument" from set_mempolicy and mbind whenever > any of these flags is passed along with MPOL_LOCAL. > It is consistent with MPOL_PREFERRED passed with empty nodemask. > It slightly shortens the execution time in paths where these flags > are used e.g. when trying to rebind the NUMA nodes for changes in > cgroups cpuset mems (mpol_rebind_preferred()) or when just printing > the mempolicy structure (/proc/PID/numa_maps). > Isolated tests done. > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@gmail.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 0/1] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for local NUMA mode Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 18:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for local NUMA mode David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-11-01 01:30 +0100
csiph-web