Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1512675
| From | Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Fix stack alignment when processing backtraces |
| Date | 2016-10-31 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <synDb-4Pf-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <stG3L-4JB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sygBH-8tq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > -.Ldumpstm: stmfd sp!, {instr, reg, stack, r7, lr}
> > + /* Must maintain 8 byte stack alignment */
> > +.Ldumpstm: stmfd sp!, {r3, instr, reg, stack, r7, lr}
> > mov stack, r0
> > mov instr, r1
> > mov reg, #10
> > @@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
> > teq r7, #0
> > adrne r0, .Lcr
> > blne printk
> > - ldmfd sp!, {instr, reg, stack, r7, pc}
> > + ldmfd sp!, {r3, instr, reg, stack, r7, pc}
>
> I'd prefer r8 to get used rather than r3, as it makes it look like
> r3 is somehow required to be preserved when that's not the case.
> Makes the code slightly more difficult to understand.
Sure, I will change that and send it to your tracker.
Thanks,
Jason
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Fix stack alignment when processing backtraces Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-10-31 10:00 +0100 Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Fix stack alignment when processing backtraces Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-10-31 17:30 +0100
csiph-web