Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem
Date	2016-10-28 20:40 +0200
Message-ID	<sxkem-3uE-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sxcA9-73j-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxhzQ-1Im-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:43:24AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:

> Do we see this as a chicken and egg situation, or is there any harm
> beyond the pains of supporting an out-of-tree driver for a while, to
> wait until we have at least one other TEE to add to this subsystem
> before merging?

We haven't been overburneded with TEE vendors wanting to get their
driver code into mainline - do we have any reasonable prospect of other
TEE vendors with an interest in mainline turning up in any kind of
reasonable timeframe?

Thread

[PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> - 2016-10-28 12:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2016-10-28 17:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-10-28 20:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2016-11-01 20:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> - 2016-10-29 11:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2016-10-31 19:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> - 2016-11-03 20:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v12 RESEND 0/4] generic TEE subsystem Volodymyr Babchuk <vlad.babchuk@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:00 +0100

csiph-web