Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1509475

Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and #pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins

From Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and #pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins
Date 2016-10-26 16:20 +0200
Message-ID <swxdE-4QU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <swd5g-8aC-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <swd5h-8aC-57@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [161025 09:51]:
> We can now use generic parser. To support the legacy binding without
> #pinctrl-cells, add pcs_quirk_missing_pinctrl_cells() and warn about
> missing #pinctrl-cells.
...

> +/**
> + * pcs_quirk_missing_pinctrl_cells - handle legacy binding
> + * @pcs: pinctrl driver instance
> + * @np: device tree node
> + * @cells: number of cells
> + *
> + * Handle legacy binding with no #pinctrl-cells. This should be
> + * always two pinctrl-single,bit-per-mux and one for others.
> + * At some point we may want to consider removing this.
> + */
> +static int pcs_quirk_missing_pinctrl_cells(struct pcs_device *pcs,
> +					   struct device_node *np,
> +					   int cells)
> +{
> +	struct property *p;
> +	const char *name = "#pinctrl-cells";
> +	int error;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	error = of_property_read_u32(np, name, &val);
> +	if (!error)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	dev_warn(pcs->dev, "please update dts to use %s = <%i>\n",
> +		 name, cells);
> +
> +	p = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev, sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!p)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	p->length = sizeof(__be32);
> +	p->value = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev, sizeof(__be32), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!p->value)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	*(__be32 *)p->value = cpu_to_be32(cells);
> +
> +	p->name = devm_kstrdup(pcs->dev, name, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!p->name)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pcs->missing_nr_pinctrl_cells = p;
> +
> +	return of_add_property(np, pcs->missing_nr_pinctrl_cells);
> +}

Looking at some make randconfig results, looks like we don't have
of_add_property() and of_remove_property() exported. Is there some
reason not to export them?

Regards,

Tony

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and #pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-25 18:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and  #pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-10-26 16:20 +0200

csiph-web