Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1510585

Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare()

From "Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@brocade.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare()
Date 2016-10-27 21:10 +0200
Message-ID <swYdQ-5WT-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sus8p-3Z6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <suFIm-4q7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <suPeG-2CB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sw91D-5BL-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/25/2016 08:22 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-10-21 17:03:56 [-0400], Charles (Chas) Williams wrote:
>> 	[    3.107126] init_rapl_pmus: maxpkg 4
> there! vmware bug. It probably worked by chance.

Yes, the behavior is a bit random.

> I assume "init_rapl_pmus: maxpkg 4" is from init_rapl_pmus() returning
> topology_max_packages(). So it says 4 but then returns 65535 for CPU 2
> and 3. That -1 comes probably from topology_update_package_map(). Could
> you please send a complete boot log and try the following patch? This
> one should fix your boot problem and disable RAPL if the info is
> invalid.

But sometimes the topology info is correct and if I get lucky, the
package id could be valid for all the CPU's.  Given the behavior,
I have seen so far it makes me thing the RAPL isn't being emulated.
So even if I did boot onto a "valid" set of cores, would I always be
certain that I will be on those cores?

> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
> index 0a535cea8ff3..f5d85f2853d7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
> @@ -682,6 +682,15 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
>  {
>  	int maxpkg = topology_max_packages();
>  	size_t size;
> +	unsigned int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		if (topology_logical_package_id(cpu) >= maxpkg) {
> +			pr_err("rapl pmu error: max package: %u but CPU%d belongs to %u\n",
> +			       maxpkg, cpu, topology_logical_package_id(cpu));
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
>
>  	size = sizeof(*rapl_pmus) + maxpkg * sizeof(struct rapl_pmu *);
>  	rapl_pmus = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);

Per your request in your next email:

>One thing I forgot to ask: Could you please check if you get the same
>pkgid reported for cpu 0-3 on a pre-v4.8 kernel? (before the hotplug
>rework).

Our previous kernel was 4.4, and didn't use the logical package id:

         /* check if phys_is is already covered */
         for_each_cpu(i, &rapl_cpu_mask) {
                 if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i))
                         return;

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare() "Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@brocade.com> - 2016-10-27 21:10 +0200
  Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-28 10:10 +0200
    Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare() "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com> - 2016-11-01 11:40 +0100
      Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-02 18:30 +0100
        Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare() "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com> - 2016-11-03 19:30 +0100
    Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare() "Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@brocade.com> - 2016-11-02 10:40 +0100
      Re: [PREEMPT-RT] Oops in rapl_cpu_prepare() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-02 11:00 +0100

csiph-web