Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE

From	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE
Date	2016-10-27 09:30 +0200
Message-ID	<swNip-7bf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <svI1s-4up-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <svIb7-4yd-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <svRo6-2jl-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sw4uZ-2vP-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <swAEx-73J-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Andrew,

On 2016-10-26 19:51:03 [+0200], Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-10-25 09:30 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> 
> > On 2016-10-24 19:32:30 [+0200], Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> On 2016-10-24 09:43 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On 2016-10-24 09:38:49 [+0200], Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> But make still fails with it. :-(
> >> >
> >> > try setting CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE=y and please let me know if
> >> > the resulting kernel built with v3.2 gcc boots & works.
> >> 
> >> Sorry, I don't have gcc 3.2 around, and my gcc 3.3 environment produces
> >> assembler errors in arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S.  Maybe binutils 2.15 is
> >> not recent enough anymore?
> 
> I have done a few more tests, and I can confirm that binutils 2.17 is
> the oldest version that works.  Also, I have succeeded installing gcc
> 3.2 in a Debian 4.0 chroot now.
> 
> > so we use stone age gcc but take latest binutils and kernel? What about
> > lifting the limit of gcc 3.2?
> 
> Would probably make sense, since gcc 3.2 cannot compile kernel/bounds.c,
> at least not on x86.
> 
> ,----
> |   CC      kernel/bounds.s
> | In file included from /tmp/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:512,
> |                  from include/linux/bitops.h:22,
> |                  from include/linux/kernel.h:10,
> |                  from include/asm-generic/bug.h:13,
> |                  from /tmp/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:38,
> |                  from include/linux/bug.h:4,
> |                  from include/linux/page-flags.h:9,
> |                  from kernel/bounds.c:9:
> | /tmp/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/arch_hweight.h: In function `__arch_hweight32':
> | /tmp/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/arch_hweight.h:29: syntax error before string constant
> | make[1]: *** [kernel/bounds.s] Error 1
> `----
> 
> Building with gcc 3.3 is apparently still possible, although it produces
> tons of warnings and a modpost section mismatch.  Still, requiring gcc
> 4.1 or newer would not be unreasonable, I think (still released a few
> months earlier than binutils 2.17).

I remember you had once a server box running some enterprise distro
which had an old gcc. Do you see any reason for not lifting the minimum
gcc version to v4.1 ?

> Cheers,
>        Sven

Sebastian

Thread

[RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-21 13:20 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2016-10-21 23:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2016-10-23 18:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-10-23 21:30 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2016-10-24 09:40 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-24 09:50 +0200
            Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2016-10-24 19:40 +0200
              Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-10-24 19:50 +0200
              Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-25 09:40 +0200
                Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2016-10-26 20:00 +0200
                Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-27 09:30 +0200
                Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-10-29 01:10 +0200
              Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> - 2016-10-29 12:20 +0200
                Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2016-10-29 19:10 +0200
                Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> - 2016-10-29 21:30 +0200
                Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2016-10-29 23:30 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-10-24 12:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 19:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: add -fno-PIE Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-28 10:10 +0200

csiph-web