Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1510024
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/8] autofs - use path_is_mountpoint() to fix unreliable d_mountpoint() checks |
| Date | 2016-10-27 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <swIsp-41y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sqXXb-2AW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sqXXb-2AW-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 01:34:18PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> + path = file->f_path;
> +
> /*
> * An empty directory in an autofs file system is always a
> * mount point. The daemon must have failed to mount this
> @@ -123,7 +126,7 @@ static int autofs4_dir_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> * it.
> */
> spin_lock(&sbi->lookup_lock);
> - if (!d_mountpoint(dentry) && simple_empty(dentry)) {
> + if (!path_is_mountpoint(&path) && simple_empty(dentry)) {
Why not &file->f_path, provided that you constify that thing properly?
> + if (rcu_walk) {
> + if (!path_is_mountpoint_rcu(path))
> + return -EISDIR;
> + } else {
> + if (!path_is_mountpoint(path))
> + return -EISDIR;
IDGI. What's the point of _having_ the _rcu() variant, anyway? Here you
are probably paying more in terms of i-cache footprint/branch prediction
than you win on not doing that rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock()...
_rcu variants make sense when non-RCU case does something you can't do
under RCU; here your path_is_mountpoint() is pretty close to being
rcu_read_lock()+path_is_mountpoint_rcu()+rcu_read_unlock() anyway...
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 6/8] autofs - use path_is_mountpoint() to fix unreliable d_mountpoint() checks Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-10-27 04:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH 6/8] autofs - use path_is_mountpoint() to fix unreliable d_mountpoint() checks Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> - 2016-10-27 05:00 +0200
csiph-web