Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1506721

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook

Path csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook
Date Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:20:01 +0200
Message-ID <svtF7-3ep-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <svpBv-q6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <svpBv-q6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <svqed-Xq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <svspI-2hg-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nexus-software-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SWSv1aB3kHvfBGVX3Ole0Ovi5j5DH/mTGuSpvqtoGBs=; b=hzMrvlhweiU6GQuJj613Vrmswf70gLpH1NuqzsqRvffqA/DhiJOZ5RrilvOLb39R6F flOma9vmle7WsxIE3amUWyH5DC76POfwVY5/WYyOMSFtJB9EO1LH+72rXhKN2zYK4Fyt aPkvTTyYJz8HmVlfn+zIkyZZSYXgdhUAWLN5NE2LLysNL3Hw4yB3b7MhQFWJ0jEeVG4r l7+W/BK4Umz49NXESxWDOyAxiJLFgTLKGz/j5ucQaihG1SZuRwtZ9C6RxfVN45pq1cMX /MVe8UBsP6zatbo2z7mW9//q2YQy/FEczwmltl2jdhTt8JmWBpbWRWQ+WT3fmRDgivpv lbfg==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SWSv1aB3kHvfBGVX3Ole0Ovi5j5DH/mTGuSpvqtoGBs=; b=BwytcjSFrziigvyn12zaSzYoKks/A/Q34/IVtiEwTyg9mDb33C9XBiQt9Of4yahltg 6f+mqRw/NwH/wushSgBSAWI7GKWRwgW5V8f0GSn/qwaYu37YcT1i58LgnyJK8Ke1Kgs7 Vm47kAko+aHMx5lo44Or2/2cR13frhzspH10jlY763Fdonqf48spIatu5SUTSiNBy2wR MF5EPrnC0X4WYZ288hGUkNcueFmqwTMSQsr78y7vDfM7JfftfFYXjf6+NlQABcBDMIkP UkvO/UmGDYmeqvleUN7ZRgfCdELGqhK4ZzR7XyB9elrOciF4GRLej3K1/he6V2hnk/Fl hEkA==
X-Gm-Message-State ABUngvdUufDHNSHpu3hRQgJHoWAVzl91tF+ncYQSjd0P2t/MvhUO14O7VR50/A4nv22SRQ==
X-Received by 10.194.202.195 with SMTP id kk3mr8154563wjc.37.1477239533415; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 68
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Original-Date Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:25:52 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <1477239952.25812.11.camel@nexus-software.ie>
X-Original-References <cover.1477221514.git.lukas@wunner.de> <7c1567d4c49303a4aada94ba16275cbf56b8976b.1477221514.git.lukas@wunner.de> <1477226275.2932.54.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20161023145757.GA4909@wunner.de>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1506721

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 16:57 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:37:55PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > 
> The usage of a mutex in mid_pwr_set_power_state() actually seems
> questionable since this is called with interrupts disabled:

> pci_pm_resume_noirq
>   pci_pm_default_resume_early
>     pci_power_up
>       platform_pci_set_power_state
>         mid_pci_set_power_state
>           intel_mid_pci_set_power_state
>             mid_pwr_set_power_state


That was my other question then - though I assume the mutex is put in
place to future-proof the code.

I'm just wondering out loud - considering we have the case where we update a register and then spin waiting for a command completion - is it in fact logically valid to have a concurrent reader read out the power state - when another writer is executing mid_pwr_wait() - for example.

/* Wait 500ms that the latest PWRMU command finished */
static int mid_pwr_wait(struct mid_pwr *pwr)
{
        unsigned int count = 500000;
        bool busy;

        do {
                busy = mid_pwr_is_busy(pwr);
                if (!busy)
                        return 0;
                udelay(1);
        } while (--count);

        return -EBUSY;
}

static int mid_pwr_wait_for_cmd(struct mid_pwr *pwr, u8 cmd)
{
        writel(PM_CMD_CMD(cmd) | PM_CMD_CM_IMMEDIATE, pwr->regs +
PM_CMD);
        return mid_pwr_wait(pwr);
}

static int __update_power_state(struct mid_pwr *pwr, int reg, int bit,
int new)
{

<snip>
        /* Update the power state */
        mid_pwr_set_state(pwr, reg, (power & ~(3 << bit)) | (new <<
bit));

        /* Send command to SCU */
        ret = mid_pwr_wait_for_cmd(pwr, CMD_SET_CFG);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
<snip>
}

anyway...

I've tested your patch and it looks good. We can otherwise defer to
andy on the usage of the mutex.

Tested-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>

---
bod

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3 0/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-10-23 14:00 +0200
  [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit pci_platform_pm_ops  ->get_state hook Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-10-23 14:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie> - 2016-10-23 14:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-10-23 17:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie> - 2016-10-23 18:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-24 11:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-10-24 12:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-24 13:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2016-10-25 08:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie> - 2016-10-26 16:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit  pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-26 17:10 +0200

csiph-web