Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1507725

Re: solo6010 modprobe lockup since e1ceb25a (v4.3 regression)

From Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@fastmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: solo6010 modprobe lockup since e1ceb25a (v4.3 regression)
Date 2016-10-24 23:00 +0200
Message-ID <svUvE-4ir-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <slVjj-6IZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <slYTU-wK-63@gated-at.bofh.it> <sm1yq-29m-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <smfBo-2E2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <svTge-3ya-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:32:33PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:21:44 +0200
> khalasa@piap.pl (Krzysztof HaƂasa) escreveu:
> 
> > Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@fastmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > > Lockup happens only on 6010. In provided log you can see that 6110
> > > passes just fine right before 6010. Also if 6010 PCI ID is removed from
> > > solo6x10 driver's devices list, the freeze doesn't happen.  
> > 
> > Probably explains why I don't see lockups :-)
> > 
> > I will have a look.
> 
> Any news on this? Should the patch be applied or not? If not, are there
> any other patch to fix this regression?

Actual patch is

Subject: [PATCH v2] media: solo6x10: fix lockup by avoiding delayed register write
Message-Id: <20161022153436.12076-1-andrey.utkin@corp.bluecherry.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:34:36 +0100

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: solo6010 modprobe lockup since e1ceb25a (v4.3 regression) Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2016-10-24 21:40 +0200
  Re: solo6010 modprobe lockup since e1ceb25a (v4.3 regression) Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@fastmail.com> - 2016-10-24 23:00 +0200

csiph-web